Three Investment Income StrategiesMarch 1, 2016
With interest rates at all-time lows in the U.S. and negative in other parts of the world, investors are desperately searching for ways to create sustainable income from their investment portfolios. Below are three strategies that can potentially be used for creating income.
The first place investors usually turn is bonds with longer maturities, lower credit ratings or some combination of both.
Here are the risks you need to understand. First, as interest rates increase, the prices on longer-maturity bonds decline more than shorter-maturity bonds, holding all else equal. The price decline due to small interest rate increases can erase the yield advantages of longer-maturity bonds.
With lower-credit rating bonds comes greater risk that the issuer will suspend payment or even default on the bond entirely. And if the credit rating declines for whatever reason, the price decline in the bond may offset any yield advantages of higher-yielding bonds.
Remember, bonds rated lower than BBB are referred to as “junk” bonds for a reason.
Historically, the top quartile of dividend-paying stocks earned a dividend yield almost double the market, 3.9% vs. 2.0% per annum.1
This increase in yield is not without risk. The number of companies paying dividends has declined over the years, with only 61% of the global market paying dividends. The result is that a portfolio constructed to provide a high dividend yield may also become highly concentrated.
There is no guarantee that a company will continue to pay a dividend. In 2009, a total of 57% of dividend-paying firms either decreased or eliminated their dividends.2 General Electric is a good example, cutting its quarterly dividend from $0.31 per share during 2008 to $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2009.2 You have no control over your income with this strategy. You put your income at the mercy of a handful of dividend-paying companies.
A third way to create income from a portfolio is to harvest income (bond interest and stock dividends) and price appreciation. We call this a total return approach to income creation.
Total return is similar to the first two approaches in that an investor spends the income generated by the portfolio. It is only when an investor needs additional income beyond what was generated from the portfolio that the methods diverge.
Instead of taking more risk in bonds or concentrating in dividend-paying stocks, the investor harvests capital gains within the portfolio. For example, assume you invested $10 in a portfolio that is now worth $10.50 and had earned income of $0.50 during the year. If you want $1 of income for the year you could sell $0.50 of gains to add to the $0.50 of income already earned. The result, a portfolio worth $10 and $1 of income to meet spending needs. Assuming the portfolio continues to grow, you could repeat this process throughout your retirement.
Investors can do this without affecting the risk or diversification of their portfolios. It can be more tax efficient because long-term capital gains are taxed at a lower tax rate than ordinary income. It also gives the investor the option of deciding when to generate income and pay taxes, a valuable option lost with the first two methods.
We believe in using the total return approach to creating income. This approach doesn’t require a shift in risk or concentration and can potentially lower tax expense, putting more money in your pocket.
1 Black, Stanley, Global Dividend-Paying Stocks: A Recent History, Dimensional, March 2013.
Sign up to get email updates with our latest blog posts